Crossle Record
Page 98
In a business to prove the will of Mary Woodward late of the city of Dublin, widow, deced, why admion should not be granted to Rev. Stafford Lightburne, Clke., promoter and Benjamin Woodward, exor of sd will, in pregnater; probate gtd 12 Nov 1746 to Rev Stafford Lightburne.
Exchequer Bill:
John Brock, Plt.
Pakenham Beaty, Charles, John and Robert Beaty, Alexander Burrows, Martha his wife, (Robert McCawly) Anne McCawly (his wife) John Beaty and Catherine Beaty (and Anne Beaty, widow) Defts.
Bill 22 July 1742. Bill amended 17 Nov. 1742 by adding parties by order 13 Nov.
Answer Pakenham, John and Robert Beaty 26 April 1743
Answer Anne, Charles and Robert Beaty, Alex Burrows and wife, Anne M’Awley, John Beaty the younger, and Catherine Beaty, 3 May 1743.
Exceptions to Charles, Robert and Anne Beaty 17 June 1743
Exceptions to Pakenham, John, and Robert Beaty 17 June 1743
Further answer Robt McCally, Robert and Anne Beaty 9 Nov. 1743
Further answer Pakenham and Charles Beaty 14 Nov 1743
Further answer John Beaty 20 January 1749
Rep’n 8 Feb. 1743 Rejr to all the Debts. 1 March 1743
Plaintiff John Brock of KillPatrick, co. Westmeath, sheweth. That John Beaty late of Springtown, co. Longford, held by lease the lands of Springtown and Kelly na, co. Longford from James Hervetson of the city of Dublin, Esq., of which 31 years were unexpired at the time of his death at a profit of £120 per ann.; and also of a lease of 10 years unexpired of the lands of Trounrah, co. Westmeath at a profit of £40 per ann.; and there was due to said John Beaty arrear of rent out of said lands to a considerable value; and he died possessed of other considerable effects worth more than £2000. That said John Beaty died on 3 May 1729, intestate leaving 5 sons and 3 daus: Parkenham, Charles, John, Robert, Henry, Anna, Martha, and Isabella Beaty and Anne Beatty his widow; and that John Beaty had liberally advanced and provided for his said sons during his lifetime to set them up in their respective businesses they follow more than what their proportions of said testators effect would amount to if the same were to be put in ?. That said John Beaty being minded to provide for his daughters did agree with his elder son Packenham Beatty to make a provision to the value of £1000 and in conson. thereof he gave to Packenham Beaty possession of said lands he Packenham Beaty executing a bond to hold same in trust for his sisters to pay to each of them £200 when 18 or upon marriage. That when John Beatty died said Pakenham Beaty possessed himself of said lands and the other effects to the value
|
